So far I am about half way through "America As Second Creation" and it is really blowing my mind. I realize we are to read up to chapter 7 according to our syllabus so I am assuming that "half way" means that I am "done" with the book for the class.
So far, here are my thoughts about some of the interesting things talked about in chapter 6 and 7:
The middle of the nineteenth century had two criticism coming from two different sides. The first to criticize were criticizing because of the exploitation of the average mill worker. The second to criticize was most likely not from the mill worker and their concerns about the mills negative affect on the environment. Mills of all forms were being critiqued for their negative environmental affect. A professor from Harvard, Louis Agassiz, blamed one of the many aspects of pollution, the decline of fish, on sawdust, dyes, acids, and the many different industrial wastes. The American way of thinking, where they are creating a second creation, is actually destroying the first creation instead. This is a brilliant realization that I feel leaves no real room for argument. The colonists, then the innovators, who used "second creation" as an excuse for spreading their own selfish initiatives are now being confronted about it in a very real way. This argument between the two still goes on to this day and I doubt it will end any time soon.
In Chapter 7 the discussion begins about the beginning of the extensive maze of rail roads and canals that were meant to unite the young nation. Canals showed a big increase in investments, especially in 1817 with the Erie Canal. The Canal was two times longer than any canal in Europe. Which showed a form of dominance that the young nation was having on it's older brother of England. It was common to compare the first canals to railroads, the chapter says.
I only got about half way through the first chapter but it looks good.
Steven